@EdLatimore
Former heavyweight boxer (13-1-1) with a degree in physics | Sorta polyglot | Stuck at 1800-ish chess.com rating | Stoic Street Smarts Newsletter 👇
Posts
53
147 decrease
This section shows tweet / post counts for the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
180.7K
26.5% decrease
This is the total number of impressions your posts have made in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Likes
1.2K
34.1% decrease
This is the total number of likes you've received in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Followers
22
0.0% increase
This is the total number of followers you have acquired in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
Impressions
We collect new impression data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Followers
Followers
We collect new follower counts each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Engagement
Engagement
We collect new engagement data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Top Posts
Top Posts
We show the top posts from the last 7 days.
| Post | Impressions | Retweets | Quotes | Likes | Replies | Engagement Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Let's define "talent" as being +95th percentile at something. I believe that everyone is talented at *something*. The problem is that most people will either: 1) Not try hard enough at something to unearth that talent. 2) Not try enough things to figure out where their talent lies. 3) Get stuck doing something they're merely good at, never discovering where they can be great. | 20.7K | 14 | 1 | 70 | 9 |
0.66%
|
|
| Crackheads are a form of rent control, it seems. https://t.co/OpN49MHFm2 | 19K | 5 | 5 | 68 | 6 |
0.48%
|
|
| Society doesn't have a homeless people problem. Homeless people have a society problem. | 17.3K | 9 | 0 | 120 | 9 |
0.84%
|
|
| Unpopular opinion: Dahmer should be a 1st ballot Hall of Famer. Not the most impressive stats, but the fact that all of his victims were grown men men makes it easy. If JWG and TB36 got in, Dahmer deserves a Yellow Straight Jacket. | 16.4K | 2 | 2 | 44 | 9 |
0.35%
|
|
| One thing that still surprises me is how much of personality is innate. | 14.4K | 8 | 0 | 45 | 6 |
0.51%
|
|
| Most people have never been in a situation where they actually had to save themselves, and it shows. | 14.4K | 15 | 2 | 100 | 6 |
0.91%
|
|
| It's easy to be an asshole. It's easy to be a doormat. The challenge is not in the extremes. The challenge is to be stern but personable. The challenge is to be kind but tough. | 8.5K | 41 | 1 | 227 | 7 |
3.55%
|
|
| Aim to be less stupid rather than more intelligent. 39 *great* moves can be undone with one blunder, but 40 *good* moves in a row is VERY hard to beat. | 8.3K | 9 | 1 | 98 | 9 |
1.6%
|
|
| Now that I'm putting together the marketing plan for Hard Lessons From The Hurt Business, the book proposal is even MORE useful. So far, the book proposal: -Got me the agent -Got me the deal -Help me write the book when I was lost -And now it's helping me with the marketing Even if you don't plan to go the traditional route, a book proposal is still a worthwhile thing to invest time into. This 68-page document that took me 3 months to refine continues to be a saving grace. | 7.8K | 2 | 1 | 22 | 6 |
0.44%
|
|
| Every news story isn't a distraction from another. I promise you the news covers multiple stories daily. Your lack of awareness of a situation doesn't mean no news outlets are reporting it. It just means the news outlets *you* follow aren't covering it. | 7K | 10 | 0 | 61 | 7 |
1.17%
|
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (14 + 1 + 70 + 9 + 42) / 20687 * 100 =
For this tweet: (14 + 1 + 70 + 9 + 42) / 20687 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (5 + 5 + 68 + 6 + 7) / 19005 * 100 =
For this tweet: (5 + 5 + 68 + 6 + 7) / 19005 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (9 + 0 + 120 + 9 + 7) / 17317 * 100 =
For this tweet: (9 + 0 + 120 + 9 + 7) / 17317 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (2 + 2 + 44 + 9 + 0) / 16354 * 100 =
For this tweet: (2 + 2 + 44 + 9 + 0) / 16354 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (8 + 0 + 45 + 6 + 14) / 14407 * 100 =
For this tweet: (8 + 0 + 45 + 6 + 14) / 14407 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (15 + 2 + 100 + 6 + 8) / 14359 * 100 =
For this tweet: (15 + 2 + 100 + 6 + 8) / 14359 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (41 + 1 + 227 + 7 + 27) / 8539 * 100 =
For this tweet: (41 + 1 + 227 + 7 + 27) / 8539 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (9 + 1 + 98 + 9 + 16) / 8314 * 100 =
For this tweet: (9 + 1 + 98 + 9 + 16) / 8314 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (2 + 1 + 22 + 6 + 3) / 7783 * 100 =
For this tweet: (2 + 1 + 22 + 6 + 3) / 7783 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (10 + 0 + 61 + 7 + 4) / 7028 * 100 =
For this tweet: (10 + 0 + 61 + 7 + 4) / 7028 * 100 =