@iansvo
Ian Svoboda. Working @GenerateBlocks. Previously @10up @thepromenadeco. Creating a WordPress Development Course: t.co/DsjrRAxD2l.
Posts
29
7 increase
This section shows tweet / post counts for the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
25.9K
318.4% increase
This is the total number of impressions your posts have made in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Likes
115
105.4% increase
This is the total number of likes you've received in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Followers
8
0.9% increase
This is the total number of followers you have acquired in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
Impressions
We collect new impression data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Followers
Followers
We collect new follower counts each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Engagement
Engagement
We collect new engagement data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Top Posts
Top Posts
We show the top posts from the last 7 days.
| Post | Impressions | Retweets | Quotes | Likes | Replies | Engagement Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @DavidBHayter Snake eater remake?! | 9.3K | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
0.13%
|
|
| Ok I’m going to break down a few of the claims made by both parties here. I’d also like to remind you that there isn’t a “good guy” in this. They both suck for various reasons, some different some the same. 1. The WP Foundation Even a cursory glance from a non-lawyer would show that the foundation has not been following its own rules with respect to licensure or the directors that they appoint. As far as I can see that foundation is essentially bullshit and was away for Automattic (A8C) to try and claim that they did give up a trademark when in reality, they absolutely did not. 2. Trademark on WordPress and WooCommerce The only valid use of this trademark should be the ability to run https://t.co/odtHO1k11O. The WordPress brand guidelines have stated for years that you cannot use “WordPress” in your company, name directly or in a domain name for instance. The whole argument that they are using the WordPress trademark in a misleading way is obviously incorrect both legally and semantically. This whole point hinges on the assertion that WP engine deliberately misled people into thinking that they were in fact https://t.co/odtHO1k11O or https://t.co/I3Wa3ZVkBR. Which really just means that the customers of both platforms are not being properly educated. And perhaps most importantly, https://t.co/odtHO1k11O frequently profits off of the misunderstanding of the general public who don’t realize that https://t.co/9Z79LjB0pB paid service and https://t.co/7QVusIsf6R source project are not, in fact, the same thing. 3. WP Engine is not in this for idealism WP engine has repeatedly shown itself to be accompany that is focused on profits above all else, including community contributions. If you read this long complaint letter that they’ve posted they tried to say that some of their community contributions have been: - Sponsoring events - Running their own conference - “… hosting, funding, and actively maintaining various open source projects such as ACF, WPGraphQL, and FaustJS - education through webinars, podcasts, and tutorials It is utterly misleading to refer to ACF, a premium plug-in that was not even built by them, as a “community contribution”. Furthermore, virtually every single one of those other things are lead and sales generators for them not just something they’re doing out of the kindness of their heart. They don’t do anything that doesn’t directly lead back to their ability to make a profit from it. As a VC backed biz, I don’t hold them against them, but don’t get it twisted: their leadership does not care about you or the community as a whole. That said, I know a few people personally who work at WP engine and I know there are a lot of people there. Who care about doing good work and do care about the community. But this isn’t really about the individual people on the ground and more about the leadership of the company as a whole. 4. A8C has objectively done good things for us all, but they aren’t the good guy either A8C does provide a lot of free resources or labor that they don’t see a dime back from. Part of the reason they are able to do this though is because their business is sound and makes money in other ways. Just like WP engine they are a for-profit company and they also are investor backed. So while Matt wants to be a benevolent dictator for the project, he doesn’t get to just make every single decision that the company makes. In recent years, I found that Mullenweg has managed to make a negative image for himself online (per what I’ve seen and others say) by just being out of touch or otherwise just being an ass to people he comes in conflict with. I think in general, he is not trying to be a jerk or is fundamentally a bad person, but I don’t exactly get a feeling of authenticity from him and I think a lot of of other people have mentioned this before as well. | 8.3K | 6 | 0 | 46 | 10 |
0.97%
|
|
| @TheCinesthetic Black Friday and the HE reunion scenes from Zack and Miri are the stuff of legend | 2.5K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0.0%
|
|
| @NoContextHumans Both of these people suck | 1.4K | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0.14%
|
|
| @photomatt @wp_acf This is low dude | 902 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
1.77%
|
|
| At the end of the day, both of these companies need to start making decisions that are in the best interest of their customers first. The needs of millions of websites and the people that run those websites and those peoples lives should come before a public corporate pissing match. | 595 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
1.85%
|
|
| @jordanbuckley Where can I buy this (deadass) | 545 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
0.37%
|
|
| @briancoords Being a dick to ACF is super uncool | 349 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2 |
4.3%
|
|
| @andrewhoyer https://t.co/vgTo876ji1 | 292 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
2.4%
|
|
| @cstanley @ErrataRob I’m calling HTTP this from now on | 281 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
1.07%
|
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 5 + 7 + 0) / 9276 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 5 + 7 + 0) / 9276 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (6 + 0 + 46 + 10 + 18) / 8279 * 100 =
For this tweet: (6 + 0 + 46 + 10 + 18) / 8279 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 2479 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 2479 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (1 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0) / 1403 * 100 =
For this tweet: (1 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0) / 1403 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 16 + 0 + 0) / 902 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 16 + 0 + 0) / 902 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 11 + 0 + 0) / 595 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 11 + 0 + 0) / 595 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 0) / 545 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 0) / 545 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 13 + 2 + 0) / 349 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 13 + 2 + 0) / 349 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 6 + 1 + 0) / 292 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 6 + 1 + 0) / 292 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (1 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 0) / 281 * 100 =
For this tweet: (1 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 0) / 281 * 100 =