@purplepingers
I hate real estate agents - join your union. Electoral content authorised by C. Oakley, Victorian Socialists, 83 Sydney Rd, Brunswick 3056
Posts
24
11 increase
This section shows tweet / post counts for the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
256.3K
894.3% increase
This is the total number of impressions your posts have made in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Likes
8.4K
1114.5% increase
This is the total number of likes you've received in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Followers
-26
0.1% decrease
This is the total number of followers you have acquired in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
Impressions
We collect new impression data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Followers
Followers
We collect new follower counts each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Engagement
Engagement
We collect new engagement data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Top Posts
Top Posts
We show the top posts from the last 7 days.
| Post | Impressions | Retweets | Quotes | Likes | Replies | Engagement Rate | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| How good was bulk billing - RIP x | 51.8K | 162 | 6 | 2.1K | 73 |
4.49%
|
|
| Whenever I post something about squatting on Instagram I’m always surprised by the amount of people who don’t understand the difference between breaking and entering an occupied home (not legal) vs simply entering an unlocked and unoccupied home (legal). Many such cases. | 35.1K | 61 | 5 | 975 | 73 |
3.22%
|
|
| Genuine question for our major political parties - what is on the cards this election to ease housing pressures? The LNP have offered a “super for housing” policy which, according to their own modelling, will increase the cost of purchasing a home for everyone, and will only be accessible to those who can already almost afford to buy a house (completely ignoring those who will be forced to rent for their entire lives) And the Labor party have instead said they’d build a bunch of houses in the next two decades. Their own experts have said they won’t meet this target, and their own modelling shows that even if they did (which they won’t), this increase in supply will not even meet their own projected demand levels let alone ease housing affordability Do they both genuinely not have anything on the table at all? If anyone wants some free election policies I’m happy to give them some | 28.9K | 125 | 4 | 723 | 73 |
3.27%
|
|
| Upset a mortgage broker on Instagram yesterday https://t.co/8jJ8m8LQzr | 25.1K | 14 | 2 | 742 | 31 |
3.2%
|
|
| lol the libs have preselected a former cop and current real estate agent as their candidate for Werribee https://t.co/49WcGPUlum | 17.2K | 55 | 4 | 537 | 67 |
3.9%
|
|
| Incredible | 14.1K | 13 | 1 | 512 | 8 |
3.8%
|
|
| I guess this means we can order one for Albo now | 12K | 30 | 1 | 443 | 5 |
4.0%
|
|
| My favourite part about socialist theory is that most of it is short AF, which means you get more time to actually do the things. https://t.co/xVhtx1kPhD | 11.1K | 19 | 5 | 286 | 28 |
3.21%
|
|
| Look to those who profit from crisis, they’re always your enemy (especially when they’re landlords). | 9.6K | 60 | 0 | 371 | 7 |
4.65%
|
|
| Victoria had more social housing in 1999 at the end of Jeff Kennet’s 7 years as premier than we do currently after 10 years of Labor government. Fkn embarrassing. https://t.co/7vwyK22xMK | 9.2K | 82 | 4 | 481 | 13 |
6.4%
|
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (162 + 6 + 2062 + 73 + 23) / 51755 * 100 =
For this tweet: (162 + 6 + 2062 + 73 + 23) / 51755 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (61 + 5 + 975 + 73 + 16) / 35104 * 100 =
For this tweet: (61 + 5 + 975 + 73 + 16) / 35104 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (125 + 4 + 723 + 73 + 21) / 28889 * 100 =
For this tweet: (125 + 4 + 723 + 73 + 21) / 28889 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (14 + 2 + 742 + 31 + 15) / 25122 * 100 =
For this tweet: (14 + 2 + 742 + 31 + 15) / 25122 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (55 + 4 + 537 + 67 + 8) / 17215 * 100 =
For this tweet: (55 + 4 + 537 + 67 + 8) / 17215 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (13 + 1 + 512 + 8 + 0) / 14060 * 100 =
For this tweet: (13 + 1 + 512 + 8 + 0) / 14060 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (30 + 1 + 443 + 5 + 0) / 11965 * 100 =
For this tweet: (30 + 1 + 443 + 5 + 0) / 11965 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (19 + 5 + 286 + 28 + 17) / 11060 * 100 =
For this tweet: (19 + 5 + 286 + 28 + 17) / 11060 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (60 + 0 + 371 + 7 + 6) / 9551 * 100 =
For this tweet: (60 + 0 + 371 + 7 + 6) / 9551 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (82 + 4 + 481 + 13 + 7) / 9174 * 100 =
For this tweet: (82 + 4 + 481 + 13 + 7) / 9174 * 100 =