@robfrawley
I run SRC LLC, an open-source-focused software and infrastructure consulting firm in New England, US. He/Him. robfrawley.com
Posts
95
28 decrease
This section shows tweet / post counts for the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
317.5K
492.4% increase
This is the total number of impressions your posts have made in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Likes
8K
777.4% increase
This is the total number of likes you've received in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Followers
7
0.3% increase
This is the total number of followers you have acquired in the last 7 days compared to the previous 7 days. If you have less than 14 days of data, we will show the available data.
Impressions
Impressions
We collect new impression data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Followers
Followers
We collect new follower counts each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Engagement
Engagement
We collect new engagement data each day if your graph isn't showing enough data yet, it's because we are waiting for more data to be available.
Top Posts
Top Posts
We show the top posts from the last 7 days.
Post | Impressions | Retweets | Quotes | Likes | Replies | Engagement Rate | Actions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People living "paycheck to paycheck" don't have a 3 million dollar home. You're confusing the phrase with "living above their means." They put themselves in a financially difficult situation, but they also have the power to change that at any time. People actually living paycheck to paycheck do not have that luxury. | 222.5K | 116 | 4 | 5.9K | 85 |
2.76%
|
|
@beniofel @damengchen No one uses that term to describe someone with 3 million dollars in real estate assets. | 17.6K | 2 | 1 | 1.1K | 19 |
6.21%
|
|
@damengchen I am muting this thread now. All the best to everyone continuing the conversation. | 13.3K | 0 | 0 | 80 | 0 |
0.6%
|
|
At least they asked. | 13.3K | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0 |
0.33%
|
|
@scarlson99 @damengchen We've covered this with Zillow listings. A 3 million dollar home is absolutely a choice, even there: https://t.co/t446ZsRYQ3 | 9.5K | 1 | 0 | 183 | 2 |
1.96%
|
|
@AlexMil92241944 @damengchen Is this better for you? https://t.co/HjfJ6GCiOp | 7.2K | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 |
1.34%
|
|
Generally, assuming a perfect world with fair application of the law, you cannot claim self-defense if you were the initial aggressor or instigator, though some exceptions exist. How it would actually work out is another question entirely. | 5.7K | 1 | 1 | 12 | 1 |
0.26%
|
|
@t3dotgg A rule34 photo is on the left. | 4.9K | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
0.14%
|
|
@TheMattBeebe @beniofel @damengchen If they took out a 3 million dollar mortgage with no money down, they and the bank are idiots. | 4.9K | 0 | 0 | 146 | 2 |
3.04%
|
|
@jamiebrough @FFmpeg Nothing about this is "out of context." | 3.1K | 0 | 0 | 182 | 0 |
5.95%
|
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (116 + 4 + 5896 + 85 + 45) / 222529 * 100 =
For this tweet: (116 + 4 + 5896 + 85 + 45) / 222529 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (2 + 1 + 1070 + 19 + 2) / 17609 * 100 =
For this tweet: (2 + 1 + 1070 + 19 + 2) / 17609 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 80 + 0 + 0) / 13326 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 80 + 0 + 0) / 13326 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 43 + 0 + 1) / 13288 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 43 + 0 + 1) / 13288 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (1 + 0 + 183 + 2 + 0) / 9473 * 100 =
For this tweet: (1 + 0 + 183 + 2 + 0) / 9473 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 95 + 0 + 1) / 7189 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 95 + 0 + 1) / 7189 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (1 + 1 + 12 + 1 + 0) / 5680 * 100 =
For this tweet: (1 + 1 + 12 + 1 + 0) / 5680 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 7 + 0 + 0) / 4898 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 7 + 0 + 0) / 4898 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 146 + 2 + 0) / 4871 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 146 + 2 + 0) / 4871 * 100 =
Engagement rate is calculated as (interactions / impressions) * 100.
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 182 + 0 + 0) / 3057 * 100 =
For this tweet: (0 + 0 + 182 + 0 + 0) / 3057 * 100 =